A Longitudinal Study of the Social Nature of the Construct of Giftedness in Adulthood

Željko Rački, Alma Škugor, Marija Sablić


The theoretical premises behind the three studies on
giftedness in adulthood and its social nature, presented here,
included the concepts of differential, ipsative and coherent
stability of abilities and traits, their accessibility to valid
consensual peer assessment, and their cumulative lifelong
social consequences when abilities and traits are high. The
studies included groups of participants attending teacher
studies, students ending their studies and transitioning to
work, and teachers with full range of work experience. The
goal of Study 1, a longitudinal study conducted on three
occasions every two years on 76 students of teacher studies
transitioning to work, was to explore the predictive validity of
the consensual social judgments of peer-assessed ability and
creativity as the basic giftedness criteria for academic
achievement, quality prospective work in education and
initial career choices. The results of Study 2, with
psychodiagnostic data available for 50 students of teacher
studies, and Study 3, with 435 employed primary school
teachers as participants, corroborated and questioned the
findings of the longitudinal study. The discussion of the
results followed the theoretical model of the development of
giftedness across one's lifespan.


giftedness in adulthood; gifted educator; teagiftedness in adulthood, gifted educator, teacher traits, teacher education, professional development

Full Text:



Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. Update to The social psychology of creativity. Boulder, CO: Westview Press Inc.

Arlin, P. K. (1999). The wise teacher: A developmental model of teaching. Theory into Practice, 38(1), 12–17. doi:10.1080/00405849909543825

Caspi, A. (2000). The child is father of the man: Personality continuities from childhood to adulthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(1), 158–172. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.78.1.158

Davis, G. A., Rimm, S. B., & Siegle, D. (2014). Leadership, Affective Learning, and Character Education. In G. A. Davis, Rimm, S. B., & Siegle, D. (Eds.), Education of the Gifted and Talented (pp. 273–290). London: Pearson Education Limited.

Gentry, M., Steenbergen-Hu, S., & Choi, B. (2011). Student-Identified Exemplary Teachers: Insights From Talented Teachers. Gifted Child Quarterly, 55(2), 111–125. doi:10.1177/0016986210397830

International Step by Step Association. (2010). Competent Educators of the 21st Century: ISSA's Principles of Quality Pedagogy. Retrieved from http://www.issa.nl/sites/default/files/Quality-Principles-final-WEB.pdf

Jussim, L., Harber, K. D., Crawford, J. T., Cain, T. R., & Cohen, F. (2005). Social reality makes the social mind: Self-fullling prophecy, stereotypes, bias, and accuracy. Interaction Studies, 6(1), 85–102. doi:10.1075/is.6.1.07jus

Karwowski, M., Kaufman, J. C., Lebuda, I., Szumski, G., & Firkowska-Mankiewicz, A. (2017). Intelligence in childhood and creative achievements in middle-age: The necessary condition approach. Intelligence, 64, 36–44. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2017.07.001

Karwowski, M., & Lebuda, I. (2017). Creative self-concept: A surface characteristic of creative personality. In G. J. Feist, R. Reiter-Palmon, & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity and personality research (pp. 84–102). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Kim, K. H. (2008). Meta-analyses of the relationship of creative achievement to both IQ and divergent thinking test scores. Journal of Creative Behavior, 42(2), 106–130. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.2008.tb01290.x

Mlačić, B., & Goldberg, L. R. (2007). An Analysis of a Cross-Cultural Personality Inventory: The IPIP Big-Five Factor Markers in Croatia. Journal of Personality Assessment, 88(2), 168–177. doi:10.1080/00223890701267993

Porath, M. (2009). What Makes a Gifted Educator? A Design for Development. In L. V. Shavinina (Ed.), International Handbook on Giftedness (pp. 825–837). Amsterdam: Springer.

Rački, Ž., Bakota, L., & Flegar, Ž. (2015). Word knowledge as predictive of linguistic creative behaviors. Review of psychology, 22(1–2), 11–18.

Renzulli, J. S. (1986). The three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model of creative productivity. In R. J. Sternberg, & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 53–92). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Renzulli, J. S. (2011). What Makes Giftedness?: Reexamining a Definition. Phi Delta Kappan, 92(8), 81–88. doi:10.1177/003172171109200821

Simonton, D. K. (2000). Creative development as acquired expertise: Theoretical issues and an empirical test. Developmental Review, 20, 283–318. doi:10.1006/drev.1999.0504

Sternberg, R. J. (2001). Giftedness as Developing Expertise: A theory of the interface between high abilities and achieved excellence. High Ability Studies, 12(2), 159–179. doi:10.1080/13598130120084311

Sternberg, R. J., & Zhang, L. (1995).What Do We Mean by Giftedness? A Pentagonal Implicit Theory. Gifted Child Quarterly, 39(2), 88–94. doi:10.1177/001698629503900205

Subotnik, R. F., & Jarvin, L. (2005). Beyond expertise: conceptions of giftedness as great performance. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 343–357). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Subotnik, R. F., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Worrell, F. C. (2011). Rethinking giftedness and gifted education: A proposed direction forward based on psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12(1), 3–54. doi:10.1177/1529100611418056

Talavas, S. N., Mavor, K. I., & Perrett, D. I. (2016). The influence of intelligence on the endorsement of the intelligence–attractiveness halo. Personality and Individual Differences, 95, 162–167. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2016.02.053

Tankersley, D., Brajković, S., & Handžar, S. (2012). Koraci prema kvalitetnoj praksi: priručnik za profesionalni razvoj učitelja razredne nastave. Zagreb: Pučko otvoreno učilište Korak po korak.

Tankersley, D., Brajković, S., Handžar, S., Rimkiene, R., Sabaliaskiene, R., Trikić, Z., & Vonta, T. (2012). Teorija u praksi: priručnik za profesionalni razvoj učitelja razredne nastave. Zagreb: Pučko otvoreno učilište Korak po korak.

Torrance, E. P. (1995). Insights about creativity: Questioned, rejected, ridiculed, ignored. Educational Psychology Review, 7(3), 313–322. doi:10.1007/BF02213376

Towers, E., & Porath, M. (2001) Gifted teaching: Thought and action. Roeper Review, 23(4), 202–206, doi:10.1080/02783190109554099

Wai, J., & Rindermann, H. (2017). What goes into high educational and occupational achievement? Education, brains, hard work, networks, and other factors. High Ability Studies, 28(1), 127–145. doi:10.1080/13598139.2017.1302874

Weisberg, R. W. (1999). Creativity and knowledge: A challenge to theories. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 226–250). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Viewing Statistics

  • Abstract - 5
  • PDF - 3

Copyright (c) 2018 Željko Rački, Alma Škugor, Marija Sablić

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Print ISSN 1330-0288 | Online ISSN 1848-6096